tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16266256.post3153914358057364302..comments2008-12-24T09:32:33.096-06:00Charleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14359044151338650019charles@politicalarithmetik.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16266256.post-51882053440192956042008-10-15T01:35:00.000-05:002008-10-15T01:35:00.000-05:00A good blogwebhostinghttp://www.hostingbay.com.au/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16266256.post-58369279124723451152008-10-13T18:49:00.000-05:002008-10-13T18:49:00.000-05:00I wonder if you could write up a post concerning the 'Acorn effect'. My thinking runs something like this - Acorn is registering many many voters, a greater fraction of those registrations are (D) than (R) or (I), and they tend to register a lot of dead, felonious, underaged or otherwise ineligible voters, especially in the (D) group. Now the pollsters see all these excess (D) voters, and they change the weightings of their polling data to match. <BR/><BR/>How much of Obama's polling lead is not really a lead at all, but just a mathematical illusion caused by Acorn?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16266256.post-65156386457381803452008-10-13T06:48:00.000-05:002008-10-13T06:48:00.000-05:00thank u r information <BR/><BR/>it very useful<BR/><BR/>u r blog Is very niceMatthewhttp://www.creativewebsitedesigner.comnoreply@blogger.com